Hey, it's only software!! The proof of the pudding...... Kevin
-----Original Message----- From: David White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 November 2001 16:07 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange I totally agree with Kevin. I am so sick of software makers comparing their product to Exchange. These are mostly email only servers. Those who use Exchange for email only have made a great mistake. UNIX and even other NT products are far better suited for this service. But, if you want a collaboration server Exchange or Lotus Notes is the way to go. Why waste resources and capital on software that won't be used? Oracle claims to have a better product for email services. That may be so but Exchange is not a comparable product. David White Systems Engineer Greenbrier&Russel [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 9:44 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Oracle vs. Exchange Oracle has built an email server to interface with 9i as the back end. Like exchange uses the Priv for its backend. Email is all it does. And with Exchange that is becoming just one little piece. If all you want is email get a Linux box. That will not cost you 40k per processor just for the database license. Don't bother to learn about it. It will not last long. There prospective market, looks like 10k plus seats.. And there are so many of those you know?? They say it can support 1,000,000 users on a single box.. Out side of the us government [1] who would that appeal to? Maybe Wal-Mart. It is a huge joke... [1] a good deal of which is getting close to nt4 upgrades. Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -----Original Message----- From: Chris Hampton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 7:32 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Oracle vs. Exchange Maybe I am missing something but how are 9i and exchange alike one is an email system and the other is a database. How are you going to cannect 9i as a smtp gateway. Chris --- Allen Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not usually a big defender of Microsoft, but I > thought this article was > a little off-base. Ellison claims that an Exchange > Server can only handle > 250-500 Outlook users. Seems like a lot of his > numbers are exaggerated to > me. Thought others might find this interesting if > you haven't already read > it. > > http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D18330,00.asp > <http://www.eweek.com/article/0,3658,s%253D1884%2526a%253D18330,00.asp> > > > > > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals http://personals.yahoo.com List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm