Good point. Thanks for clearing that up for me. I assumed it would only go out as rich text if there was rich text in the message.
Putting in the domain names and setting those to only send in plain text seems to work for now. Thanks for your help. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 1:02 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Problems with Distribution list Just because she didn't use any Rich Text "features" doesn't mean that the message wasn't in Rich Text. I hope that works for you. :-) -Michèle, MOS+BP, TSCSP, soon to be a California Girl Immigration site: <http://LadySun1969.tripod.com> The Miata has gone to live with Grandma for a little while: <http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley> Tiggercam: <http://www.tiggercam.co.uk> --------------------------------------------------------- Not only does the English Language borrow words from other languages, it sometimes chases them down dark alleys, hits them over the head, and goes through their pockets. -- Eddy Peters --------------------------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: Crosby, Tim (Sarcom) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 12:23 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Problems with Distribution list I have now. :) Seems to indicate that rich text was included with the original message. But I looked at the item she sent, and there were no colors, bold, underline etc. in the message so I'm not sure where that is coming from. I have now gone into the IMS and put in entries for the domains having trouble to always send in plain text. I hope that will fix the problem. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:49 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Problems with Distribution list Have you searched TechNet for ms-tnef? -Michèle, MOS+BP, TSCSP, soon to be a California Girl Immigration site: <http://LadySun1969.tripod.com> The Miata has gone to live with Grandma for a little while: <http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley> Tiggercam: <http://www.tiggercam.co.uk> --------------------------------------------------------- Things are going to get a lot worse before they get worse. -Lily Tomlin --------------------------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: Crosby, Tim (Sarcom) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:47 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Problems with Distribution list Oh, and by the way, I just looked at one of the replies back from someone who couldn't open the attachment. This appears where the attachment would normally be: > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > Part 1.2 Type: application/ms-tnef > > Encoding: base64 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Name: Club Pub Services.doc > Club Pub Services.doc Type: Winword File (application/msword) > Encoding: base64 -----Original Message----- From: Crosby, Tim (Sarcom) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 11:22 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Problems with Distribution list Got a strange one that I'm hoping someone has the solution for. One of our users regularly sends out attachments to a bunch of external email address that are not setup as custom recipients on our system. She has a personal distribution list that she uses which contains all the addresses. Some of the people that she sends to report that the attachment arrives at their end with an attachment named "C.DTF" instead of the file she attached. Q259065 says this can happen when sending Rich Text messages to a Lotus Notes MTA. But I checked the last time she sent a message and verified that it was all in plain text. She still says some people reported getting the C.DTF file. But it only seems to happen when sending to the group as a whole. When people send her replies saying they couldn't open the file, she then replies directly to that person with the original attachment, and they always receive that one fine. From looking at the DL, it looks to have about 65 addresses in it. Anyone seen this one before? Should I try putting those names in our system as custom recipients? Or maybe creating a DL on the exchange server with all those names in it? By the way, Exchange 5.5, SP4 running on W2K server, SP2. Client is Outlook 2000. List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
