I will have to ask the Network Eng guys about how stable that connection is. I am not considering moving the user servers. Only the OWA/IMC server.
Bob F. -----Original Message----- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 11:48 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Architecture question How stable is your DS3 connection? I understand and appreciate the remote BDC for disaster recovery and remote storage of backup media, but moving a mail server away from the users doesn't make sense to me. William -----Original Message----- From: Toni, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 11:37 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Architecture question it's too heavy?... ;-) > -----Original Message----- > From: Bob Falkenberg [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: February 21, 2002 2:25 PM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: Architecture question > > Hello Folks, > > Currently I have 4 Exchange 5.5 SP4 servers running on NT4.0 here in my > server room. 3 user servers and 1 server hosting the IMC and OWA. As > part > of the disaster recovery plan and because of other reliability issues the > head of my group wants us to move a BDC to a remote collocation. At the > same time they are asking me what servers if any from the Exchange site we > could move to the co-location. They have a DS3 in place for connectivity > to > the co-location. > > I don't think I want to move the user servers but can anyone give reasons > not to move the IMC/OWA server to the co-location? > > Bob Falkenberg > > List Charter and FAQ at: > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
