OWA2002? -----Original Message----- From: Bob Christian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 1:02 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Applying Mailbox Limits....After the Fact
It depends on your goals. Most companies use POP3 and a Flavor if Linux or FreeBSD. This is primarily because of the low hardware and software cost of implementing such a solution. You can also use something like IMHO* to give webmail access to messages stored on the server. There are positives and negatives with Exchange hosting. The negative is the licensing cost and equipment required to run Exchange as an ASP. The positive, IMHO, has to be the ability to keep the data reposed on the server and use OWA 2002 to access it! Microsoft's technet site has several articles on hosting Exchange. http://www.microsoft.com/technet/exchange Bob Bobby J. Christian II NT Systems Engineer VeriSign, Inc. Savannah, GA Carrier Division 912.527.4396 -----Original Message----- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20 Posted At: 20 February 2002 03:44 Posted To: Sunbelt Exchange List Conversation: Applying Mailbox Limits....After the Fact Subject: RE: Applying Mailbox Limits....After the Fact Is e2k a good solution for an ASP-type model? Somebody I know wants to try to host an exchange solution for multiple small companies. <BIG SNIP> List Charter and FAQ at: http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm