Ben is
right. You can do the same thing
with a hot-swappable RAID1 array.
Just unplug the bad one and plug in the new one (the way I understand it
anyway, haven’t had a failure on one yet) and it rebuilds, all online. -----Original Message----- If a RAID 1 set has a failed disk , you
HAVE to break the mirror and recreate the mirror with the new disk. This means Server downtime. If a RAID 5 set has a failed disk, you
simply replace the disk (especially hot pluggable) and the server STAYS
RUNNING.. NO downtime on the server. RAID 5 was designed for this. It does
not give you the same downtime when you have to down the server, replace the
disk and recreate the mirror.. RAID 5 will know you replaced the failed disk
and rebuild it on the fly. The server may see some performance degredation, but
it will stay running..and you dont need to down the server at all. Replaying the log files most certainly
does come into play when you create a new DB.. Ive gone thru this with PSS! -----Original Message----- How does a RAID 1
(mirroring) not keep you running in the event of a failure? I'm
curious. It most certainly IS fault-tolerant. If you lose a disk
from RAID 1, you are still running. You don't HAVE to run maintenance
until you decide to. Now, certainly, it would be idiotic NOT to replace
the failed disk right away and break/re-create the mirror, but with newer RAID
controllers, you can even do this online. RAID 5 will give you the EXACT
same downtime. You replace the dead drive, and you wait while your RAID
controller rebuilds the stripe set. But again, what is the difference
between the 2 in terms of time? What, a couple of minutes? I do
concede that AS LONG as your databases and log files are kept on separate
spindles, then I personally don't care whether you use RAID 1 or 5.
Replaying the log files comes into play when you restore the database from tape
backup. I don't think it applies to creating a new database.
Circular logging IS on by default, but most Exchange admins with experience
(meaning those that know about Exchange and its features and why certain
features are used and why others aren't) turn that feature off as one of the
first steps once they build a server. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems
Administrator Peregrine Systems http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm |
Title: Message
- RE: Why would anyone install Exchange on a PDC? MHR(Michael Ross)
- RE: Why would anyone install Exchange on a PDC? Neil Hobson
- RE: Why would anyone install Exchange on a PDC? MHR(Michael Ross)
- RE: Why would anyone install Exchange on a PDC? Ben Winzenz
- RE: Why would anyone install Exchange on a PDC? MHR(Michael Ross)
- RE: Why would anyone install Exchange on a PDC? Dennis Atherton
- RE: Why would anyone install Exchange on a PDC? MHR(Michael Ross)
- RE: Why would anyone install Exchange on a PDC? Dennis Atherton
- RE: Why would anyone install Exchange on a PDC? Jim Busick
- RE: Why would anyone install Exchange on a PDC? Allen Crawford
- RE: Why would anyone install Exchange on a PDC? Allen Crawford
- RE: Why would anyone install Exchange on a PDC? Allen Crawford
- RE: Why would anyone install Exchange on a PDC? Walt Brannon