This is true, however, the down side of that is the delay Sybari has in
releasing new pattern updates. First Sophos or Norman has to build the
update, then Sybari gets it for a day or so in their lab to certify it or
something. Then it goes out to Antigen customers. 

I was aware of this delay as we were direct Sophos customers with a Unix
product, and we used Sophos and Norman on Antigen. Our direct updates from
Sophos were a day or two ahead of the same fix from Sybari.

Our decision to move to Trend was largely due to the leveling of the playing
field with the new AVAPI that both Trend and Antigen use, and the big issue
that Trend was able to give us enterprise size NeaTSuite that included
Exchange, Servers, Desktops, and PC-Cillin for home use all for the same
price that Sybari wanted for Antigen alone. 

Trend 6 on Exchange 2000 is just as solid as Antigen.  

Walt 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 8:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Trend vs. Antigen



Best idea of all that is the different virus engines.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-K.Borndale
IT Manager
Sybari Software
631.630.8569 -direct dial
631.439.0689 -fax
http://www.sybari.com
"One man's ceiling is another man's floor"


 

                      Martin Blackstone

                      <MBlackstone@superior        To:       "MS-Exchange
Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>     
                      access.com>                  cc:

                                                   Subject:  RE: Trend vs.
Antigen                                                    
                      02/20/2002 10:23 PM

                      Please respond to

                      "MS-Exchange Admin

                      Issues"

 

 





I'm thinking the same thing. I have Trend and some NAI crap laying around.
I
was thinking Webshield (SMTP), Anigen (Exchange), Trend (Desktops and
Servers).

-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 6:12 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Trend vs. Antigen


We have a blend of both.  Why argue which is better when two antivirus is
better than one.  Interscan for NT runs between our firewall and Exchange
server.  Content management is also done on this server.  Once mail has
made
it through it then gets scanned by Antigen.  This setup works very well and
has saved us from many virus.  A good third tier solution is to have Norton
Corporate on the desktops (employees still use Hotmail, Yahoo mail to get
personal email).

Kevin Kennedy (K2)
Network Administrator
Mahi Networks, Inc.
707-283-1336


-----Original Message-----
From: John J. Riley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 06:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Trend vs. Antigen


I purchased Antigen for our Exchange server and have not, repeat have not
had any problems.  The support has been super.

JRiley
----- Original Message -----
From: "Karen Palmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MS-Exchange Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 2:48 PM
Subject: Trend vs. Antigen


> If you are weighing two products and they seem equal to you, compare
> support.  I can't say enough good things about Antigen from a product
point
> of view, but their technical support is just as good.  They are
> absolutely awesome in every way.
>
> Karen Palmer
>
>
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
>


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm






List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Reply via email to