I'm using it here for over half a year without any issues. Weird...

<Siegfried />

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 5:51 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Instant Messenger Service
> 
> The internal client accesses the standard MSNIM server why not just
use
> there's? I am so discouraging this morning. But this is not a fun
thing
> to do. Made it work once, but was so unstable, ended up giving up.
> 
> --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond
> http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesgin, GO here!
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 8:47 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Instant Messenger Service
> 
> 
> This is in experimental stage only.
> Yes, firewall in place.
> VPN is not a good option, as most of the clients we work with won't
let
> that type of traffic out for only one person.
> 
> So...what I'm trying to do is get the IM to work both directions on 80
> and 80 only, as all of the clients I know of allow 80 back and forth.
> 
> John Weber
> Consultant
> Centerlogic
> 503-262-0490 x203
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 08:32
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Instant Messenger Service
> 
> 
> Do you not have a firewall? You planning on leavening things Wide
open?
> The best way to do this would be with a VPN.
> 
> --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For
> Graphics and WebDesgin, GO here!
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 8:28 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Instant Messenger Service
> 
> 
> I have a need for the exchange hosted IM to be accessible from other,
> outside the domain, users.
> 
> In the case of my testing, I am using my domain at home to test for
> connections. [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the office [EMAIL PROTECTED] is
the
> home.
> 
> Both are fully registered FQDN dns entries, although there is no
> IM.domainA.com registered.
> 
> What I am trying to do is get the [EMAIL PROTECTED] to come in and
use
> the account for [EMAIL PROTECTED] and that is failing.  I wonder if
it
> could be that the user name for domainA and domainB are the same,
> although they are different domains.
> 
> We have some other folks who work at client sites and are logged into
> the client site domains, and as such, will be coming from an FQDN
> environment when they authenticate into my Exchange IM.
> 
> I know that I have a) something wrong, or b) this isn't going to work.
> 
> At present, I am not so far along that I can't nuke and start over if
> need be.
> 
> I used the _rvp in local DNS.  Are you saying that I may need to have
a
> IM.domainA.com registered with my exeternal DNS?
> 
> John Weber
> Consultant
> Centerlogic
> 503-262-0490 x203
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 16:46
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Instant Messenger Service
> 
> 
> Must be something else than. Using those steps I was able to get it
> running here. I didn't use an RVP record but instead a FQDN when
> creating the IM Virtual Server. Also I made sure the FQDN is
registered
> on the external DNS.
> 
> What I don't understand is why you have [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] What is the purpose of that?
> 
> What did the user enter the logon dialog at home?
> 
> On my system it is:
> 
> IM address:                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Windows 2000 user name:               MyUserName
> Windows 2000 password:                MyPassword
> Windows 2000 domain name:     MyWindows2000DomainName (netbios AFAIK)
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: John Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 12:34 AM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Instant Messenger Service
> >
> > Great last name...
> >
> > OK...I reset the password.  No workie.
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] works inside the firewall.
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] logs into his machine at home, and then tries to
> > authenticate in, and constantly gets asked for the password, and it
> > doesn't take.  Home account is using a 2Kserver box with a
registered
> > domain as the login. Messenger says that the home account login
> > doesn't have the permission
> to
> > use the email account, and asks for the proper password.
> >
> > Should work...doesn't.
> >
> > John Weber
> > Consultant
> > Centerlogic
> > 503-262-0490 x203
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 15:19
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Instant Messenger Service
> >
> >
> > The fix is to enable "Store passwords in reversible encryption" [1]
> and
> > reset each user password. Exchange 2000 IM doesn't use NTLM auth.
> >
> > [1] You have to make the decision if you want to allow that
yourself.
> > It's just the action need to be done to use Exchange IM from outside
a
> 
> > firewall.
> >
> > <Siegfried />
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: John Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 8:31 PM
> > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > Subject: RE: Instant Messenger Service
> > >
> > > We fixed the issue with the XP side by installing the setup from
the
> > e2k
> > > cd.  That adds the Exchange functionality to the Messenger.
> > >
> > > I have it working inside the firewall.
> > > When I try to login from outside the firewall I get a message
saying
> > that
> > > the user logged into the machine doesn't have rights to the email
> > account.
> > > It then asks for the credentials.
> > > When I give it the proper user name, email address, etc, it simply
> > dumps
> > > back to asking for the password.
> > >
> > > If the fix is to open the firewall to allow NTLM authentication, I
> am
> > not
> > > sure I want to do that?
> > >
> > > Any thoughts would be appreciated.
> > >
> > > John Weber
> > > Consultant
> > > Centerlogic
> > > 503-262-0490 x203
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 10:18
> > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > Subject: RE: Instant Messenger Service
> > >
> > >
> > > The IP scope doesn't matter.  IM is a specialized web application
> and
> > MSN
> > > Messenger is an application specific browser.
> > >
> > > I am aware of issues with the MSN Messenger that ships with XP.  I
> > replace
> > > it with the MSN Messenger 4.6 from the Exchange download.
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: John Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 4:25 PM
> > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > > Subject: Instant Messenger Service
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > IM on e2k sp2 setup and functioning internal to our firewall.
Went
> in
> > > pretty easy, and config wasn't too bad, except why didn't it do it
> for
> > me
> > > when I installed?  (side question, don't answer that).
> > >
> > > All the docs intimate that this puppy should accept connections
from
> 
> > > outside the firewall so our roving personnel can go to a client
> > > site, boot
> > their
> > > laptop, and connect back into the office with Messenger for
> > chat/advice
> > > etc.
> > >
> > > Anybody have this working?  I've read about the polling and fixed
> port
> > > delivery, and am working my way through the XP and Messenger and
> > Firewall
> > > stuff, but it appears that I need some help.
> > > Specifically - does this/will this work or am I spinning my
wheels?
> > > What is the client side config to point it to an exchange based IM
> > server
> > > that is not inside the current IP scope?
> > >
> > > My boss awaits with bated breath.  I'd like to know also :)
> > >
> > > TIA
> > >
> > > John Weber
> > > Consultant
> > > Centerlogic
> > > 503-262-0490 x203
> > >
> > >
> > > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > >
> > > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> > >
> > >
> > > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> >
> >
> > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> >
> >
> > List Charter and FAQ at:
> > http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
> 
> 
> 
> List Charter and FAQ at:
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm


List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm

Reply via email to