Thanks for the feedback, just curious.
What would be the best solution for a backup, clustering? Or perhaps just
having a duplicate server ready to go?
-----Original Message-----
From: Ely, Don [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 1:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: backup Server
You could do it, but I can guarantee you it would suck really,
REALLY bad.
You'd introduce a number of problems I won't even beging to explain
as it
would take way too much time to type up.
Let's just say, that this would NOT be a solid "technical" solution.
Don Ely - NMBOTWBAS and then some
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 1:29 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: backup Server
What if you had 2 servers, say exchange1 and exchange2, Exchange1
being the
existing one. You added exchange2 into the same site, duplicated all
the
mailboxes (different address), you couldn't replicate emails from
Joeuser on
exchange1 to Joeuser on exchange2?
-----Original Message-----
From: Salvador Manzo [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 12:08 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: backup Server
That is correct. If you were to install it as a new
ORG/SITE, you
could
script EXMERGE to do copy and replace into the new server,
but
nothing that
I am aware of from MS will allow live, real-time replication
in the
same
manner as SQL Server. Also, keep in mind that EXMERGE data
from one
server
to another will NOT allow automatic failover, and WILL break
Single
Instance
Storage.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 06 June, 2002 08:48
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: backup Server
So adding the server into the same site would only server
the
purpose of
load balancing, ie. Splitting mailboxes between the two
servers.
-----Original Message-----
From: Salvador Manzo
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 11:42 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: backup Server
Live replication of Exchange data will require a
thrid party
solution, such
as NSI Doubletake. I _really_ hope you've got a bit
more in
the
budget, as
we recently priced out for informational purposes
and NSI
charges
US$2500
per server. Otherwise, the only use of the new
server, IF
IT WILL
BE
JOINING THE SAME ORG/SITE, would be for load
balancing and
isolation
of
mailboxes.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Beckett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 05:34
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: backup Server
Equipment already purchased....server is already
built and
has NT on
it.
-----Original Message-----
From: William Lefkovics
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 6:25 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: backup Server
It isn't SQL.
It can't be done.
What's the budget again?
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Beckett
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 11:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: backup Server
Basically my plan was to have another server
join
the site
and then
replicate emails from the original server to
the
backup
server at
certain intervals. Issues with this?
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
List Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
