How
would their mailbox skyrocket? They are already being charged with
100 Megs of space from the moment the attachment is sent, even thought they are
all collectively pointing to the same object.
It
would seem that the the very last user to have the attachment should be charged
100 M, because that user and only that user is taking up 100 M on the
server. Why aren't mailboxes dynamically charged a proportional amount of
the original attachment in SIS.
-----Original Message-----
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 1:12 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Theoretical question concerning SIS
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 1:12 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Theoretical question concerning SIS
List Charter and FAQ at:But when the others deleted their mail, the one persons mailbox size would skyrocket. SIS is for the benefit of IT, not the end users. [1][1] Technically they do benefit as you are able to have less storage required to handle more users. That reduces the amount of $$ charged per mailbox.List Charter and FAQ at:-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Norris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 1:06 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Theoretical question concerning SISWithout SIS there would be 10 separate 100MB files each charged individually to the users. The same as if you had sent the file to only one user...List Charter and FAQ at:-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 1:02 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Theoretical question concerning SISThat could be one way of measuring it, but what about this.You email the 100MB attachment to 10 people and it costs each one 10MB by your scale. All but one delete it. Now he has to pay 100. Is that really fair that one person should be penalized for keeping the attachment?List Charter and FAQ at:-----Original Message-----
From: Micciche, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 9:52 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Theoretical question concerning SISHappy Friday everyone, came up with a thought this morning and was wondering if anyone knew the answer to the following situation.1. Exchange 5.52. Outlook 2000 clients3. No PST's.User A sends 1 100 Megabyte file to ten users. Because of SIS only 100 Megs of space was used on the Exchange server, not 1000. Each user will show that they are using 100 Megs of space, but my understanding is that there is only one 100 Meg file with 10 mailboxes pointing to it.Assuming I am correct with everything that I wrote:Why doesn't Exchange charge, and Outlook display 10 megabytes to each mailbox? After five people delete the attachment (really the pointer to the SIS 100 Meg object), the remaining five would each be charged 20 megabytes. That make any sense?My first instinct is that it would be just to damn complex. Any thoughts Guru's?By the way, this came up during an argument about PST's after I explained the benefits of SIS and using reasonable mailbox limits. Have a great weekend everyone.Robert MiccicheIT Operations ManagerMCP, MCP+I, CCNA, MCSECooper Wiring DevicesList Charter and FAQ at:
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/exchange_list_charter.htm