LMAO!!! I do! I believe I may have been one of the reasons it was created... :P
Don On Dec 27, 2007 10:28 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Anyone here remember the "CareBear" Exchange List? > > wannahug? > _ _ / > _ (o\-~-/o) _ > (o\ ( 9 9 ) /o) > \ \( (Y) )/ / > \ ) ( / > / \ > _____/ )_( \____ > =_==( (===) )=_= > | \ ) ( / | > \|vVv(__/,v#\__)V/|/|#.. > > Nikki > > From: [email protected] [mailto: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 10:40 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: Name of sender > > I'm not a fan of either the OOOs or the lack of sender names. But I've > been concerned about the quality of the list experience for some less > experienced members. Some of the list's greatest minds are not necessarily > the list's most tolerant minds, and have at least claimed to have > blacklisted everyone who has let an OOO slip through. In my opinion, that > hurts the community more than missing the sender name. Blocking the OOOs at > least alleviates that phenomenon. That said, I do hope we can have the best > of both worlds. > > Bill Songstad > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 9:24 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: Name of sender > > Dan, > <begin feedback> > > THIS SUCKS > > </end feedback> > > I would rather see who it's from that have no OOOs. I agree with WHOEVER > said it earlier it takes away from the community feel. I feel like my > virtual friends are now just anonymous entities floating out there I > cyberland. I'm sad. > > Andy > ________________________________________ > From: [email protected] [mailto: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2007 12:03 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Name of sender > > True but this does prevent anyooo's back to the sender. Doesn't everybody > have a sig in place? (maybe not for replies) > > So... I'm going to leave the setting as it is for a little bit. You guys > keep discussing Exchange related issues for the time being. Later today I'll > revisit this. > > Dan > > Btw, I usually get the Lyris lists via RSS and not via email. > > > On 12/27/07, [email protected] < > [email protected]> wrote: > But we don't see the sender anymore ! > GuidoElia > HELPPC > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ > ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~
