The primary reason for the second server is to serve the email needs of that 
company.

We had the email server and data circuit in place for other reasons so the 
fault tolerance was a freebie.

Steve



________________________________
From: Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 1:41 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: mx records



If the primary reason to have the second mail server is for fault tolerance in 
case the primary internet connection fails, and there's a dedicated T-1 between 
the sites, can't you just dual-home the E2007 box?

________________________________
From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 3:23 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: mx records


A few options. None of them great.

Delete the secondary MX as you mentioned. Spam filtering at the secondary.

Firewall port 25 on the secondary and only open it up when your primary is 
down. That isn't a bad option since you would know when you are down at your 
primary and with sending servers retrying for 48 hours or so you would have 
plenty of time to either get back up or undo the firewall block.



From: Steve Hart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 4:18 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: mx records


We have two real world MX records for our domain. The first has a preference of 
10 and points to our main email server, a new E2007 box. The second mx record 
has a preference of 200 and points to the email server of one of our affiliated 
companies. That server is an old E2000 beast. Both Exchange servers are part of 
the same Exchange Organization and there's a point to point T1 between the 
sites that provides an alternate means of delivery should our main internet 
connection die.

I'm experimenting with spam filtering on the 2007 box using SpamHaus and custom 
words and having quite a bit of success. Spam directly from the internet 
passing through the 2007 server is virtually nil. The problem is that a good 
portion of our spam (about 20%) seems to be arriving through the E2000 box 
across town. Since that server is part of internal system, the new box isn't 
filtering the mail. Headers show that even when the addresses are wrightbg.com, 
remote servers are routing the mail to wbgppm.com.  Is there a way to fix this, 
other than deleting the second mx record?

Steve











**************************************************************************************************
Note:
The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and
protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
**************************************************************************************************





~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~             http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja                ~

Reply via email to