What is the recommended naming convention then?  

 _____________
John Bowles



----- Original Message ----
From: Kevin Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues <exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 3:18:14 PM
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 and SSL certs for internal and external use


Somewhere, but we retracted that after a short period of time…
 
~Kevinm WLKMMAS
powered by 3Sharp, Always WLKMMAS What is your Zombie Plan?
 
From:Barsodi.John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 11:35 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 and SSL certs for internal and external use
 
Wasn’t it in early MS guidance for 2000 or perhaps it was 2003, that you use 
.local?  The concept of split DNS was relatively new,  if I remember correctly.
 
From:Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 11:26 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2007 and SSL certs for internal and external use
 
Interestingly, I just installed SBS 2003 R2 for a new customer yesterday, and 
the SBS installation wizard actually suggested .local! I was surprised.
 
Regards,
 
Michael B. Smith
MCSE/Exchange MVP
http://TheEssentialExchange.com
 
From:Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 11:47 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2007 and SSL certs for internal and external use
 
Why ".local"?
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Oliver Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We looked at a wildcard cert but that wont work as our internal domain is a 
.local and externally we are a .com. 
 
The users connection settings are pre-filled by Outlook 2007. Is this editable 
in AD so that we are able to change the server FQDN they connect to?
 
From:Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 13 May 2008 16:19 

To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Exchange 2007 and SSL certs for internal and external use 
 
Another way might be a 'wildcard certificate'.  One that handles *.domain.com, 
www.domain.com, domain.com, mail.domain.com, etc.  A little more spendy 
though...
 

________________________________

From:Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 10:07 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2007 and SSL certs for internal and external use
Split DNS
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 7:41 AM, Oliver Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi chaps,
 
I have an Exchange 2007 server here on which we have setup an SSL certificate 
(in the name of mail.mydomain.com). This works great for users outside using 
Outlook 2007s Outlook Anywhere feature. However, internal users get a warning 
stating that the SSL cert name doesn't match the server. It's not the biggest 
issue, but it's...untidy.
 
What's the best way to handle this? Obviously I can only attach one SSL cert to 
the Default site in IIS on the Exchange box and the internal domain 
(mydomain.local) is sufficiently different from the external one (mydomain.com) 
that we can't get an SSL cert to cover both.
 
Is there a way to create a new IIS site that still points at the same exchange 
folder structure as the current Default Site but that is set to accept a 
different hostname? That way I could have one site for the internal users 
hitting blue-server.mydomain.local and one for the external users hitting 
mail.mydomain.com and attach a correct cert to both.
 
Can this be done ?
 
Olly


      
~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~             http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja                ~

Reply via email to