It was in 2000 and the stupid MCT's today still teach it as I understand it, but I presume that is because the curriculum probably hasn't changed.... :P
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Barsodi.John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wasn't it in early MS guidance for 2000 or perhaps it was 2003, that you > use .local? The concept of split DNS was relatively new, if I remember > correctly. > > > > *From:* Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Sent:* Tuesday, May 13, 2008 11:26 AM > *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues > *Subject:* RE: Exchange 2007 and SSL certs for internal and external use > > > > Interestingly, I just installed SBS 2003 R2 for a new customer yesterday, > and the SBS installation wizard actually suggested .local! I was surprised. > > > > Regards, > > > > Michael B. Smith > > MCSE/Exchange MVP > > http://TheEssentialExchange.com <http://theessentialexchange.com/> > > > > *From:* Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Sent:* Tuesday, May 13, 2008 11:47 AM > *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: Exchange 2007 and SSL certs for internal and external use > > > > Why ".local"? > > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Oliver Marshall < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We looked at a wildcard cert but that wont work as our internal domain is > a .local and externally we are a .com. > > > > The users connection settings are pre-filled by Outlook 2007. Is this > editable in AD so that we are able to change the server FQDN they connect > to? > > > > *From:* Sam Cayze [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Sent:* 13 May 2008 16:19 > > > *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > *Subject:* RE: Exchange 2007 and SSL certs for internal and external use > > > > Another way might be a 'wildcard certificate'. One that handles *. > domain.com, www.domain.com, domain.com, mail.domain.com, etc. A little > more spendy though... > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Sent:* Tuesday, May 13, 2008 10:07 AM > *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: Exchange 2007 and SSL certs for internal and external use > > Split DNS > > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 7:41 AM, Oliver Marshall < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi chaps, > > > > I have an Exchange 2007 server here on which we have setup an SSL > certificate (in the name of mail.mydomain.com). This works great for users > outside using Outlook 2007s Outlook Anywhere feature. However, internal > users get a warning stating that the SSL cert name doesn't match the server. > It's not the biggest issue, but it's...untidy. > > > > What's the best way to handle this? Obviously I can only attach one SSL > cert to the Default site in IIS on the Exchange box and the internal domain > (mydomain.local) is sufficiently different from the external one ( > mydomain.com) that we can't get an SSL cert to cover both. > > > > Is there a way to create a new IIS site that still points at the same > exchange folder structure as the current Default Site but that is set to > accept a different hostname? That way I could have one site for the internal > users hitting blue-server.mydomain.local and one for the external users > hitting mail.mydomain.com and attach a correct cert to both. > > > > Can this be done ? > > > > Olly > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~
