Thomas,

You said this is your only server.  DC as well.  We tried this on a DC
and it came crashing down around us.  Didn't take long, about 15 minutes
after being up it just crashed.  When looking around I believe it was
said not to do this if the Exchange Server was also a DC.  It was
several years ago, so the details are fuzzy.  We rebooted, changed the
registry entries back and cycled again, all was well.

I tried it again and made sure I did the numbers properly and had the
same result.

Greg

-----Original Message-----
From: Steven Peck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 5:38 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: memory upgrade on EX2K3

And sometimes you have to go down from 3030 to 2800 or 2900 depending
on your setup and the memory used.  Check out the best practices
analyzer for more info

Steven Peck
http:www.blkmtn.org

On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Thomas Gonzalez
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did read that earlier and I just finished printing all the documents
out
> for some bedtime reading.
>
>
>
> I'm off for the day, you all have a good 3 day weekend.
>
>
>
>
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
> From: Sean Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 12:45 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: memory upgrade on EX2K3
>
>
>
> I'm no expert by any means, but based on the article, if you're
running
> Exchange 2003 on any version of Windows 2003 and  have more than 1GB
> physical memory installed, then Microsoft recommends setting the /3GB
and
> /USERVA switches. (specifically, /3GB /USERVA=3030). This simply
enables
> more PTEs on the server.
>
>
>
> Make sure to read through the rest of the article because it's equally
> important to set the HeapDeCommitFreeBlockThreshold registry value.
>
>
>
> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager
> Value name: HeapDeCommitFreeBlockThreshold
> Value type: REG_DWORD
> Value data: 0x00040000 (recommended)
> Value default: not present
>
>
>
> In addition, if you're supporting more than 500 mailboxes on your
server,
> you'll want to configure the msExchESEParamLogBuffers attribute in AD
using
> ADSIEdit.
>
>
>
> 1) Open the Configuration Container.
>
> 2) Navigate to CN=Services, CN=Microsoft Exchange, CN=<Your
Organization
> Name>
>
> 3) Expand CN=Administrative Groups, CN=<Administrative Group Name>,
> CN=Servers
>
> 4) Expand CN=<Your Server Name>, CN=Information Store
>
> 5) Right click on CN=<your storage group> and select properties. (If
you
> have multiple storage groups, you'll want to perform the following
steps for
> both)
>
> 6) find the msExchESEParamLogBuffers attribute and change the value to
9000.
>
>
>
> - Sean
>
>
>
> On 5/23/08, Thomas Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sean, that was another article I was reading as well. So I jumped
ahead to
> fast and after reading a few other docs; correct me if I am wrong. But
the
> /userva switch, should I monitor the memory performance after
implementing
> the /3GB and then determine if the PTEs drop then implement?
>
>
>
> The reason I ask this (may sound dumb) but our EX2K3 is our only
server and
> everything is hosted on it, priv and pub. Our organization is limited
on
> funds and cannot follow MS' best practices.
>
>
>
>
>
> TIA
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
> From: Sean Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, May 23, 2008 11:57 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: memory upgrade on EX2K3
>
>
>
> I found this article to be helpful:
>
>
>
> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=815372
>
>
>
> - Sean
>
>
>
> On 5/23/08, Thomas Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm upgrading our exchange 2003 memory from 2 gig to 4 gig this
weekend.
> I've been reading the documents on utilizing the /3GB switch. However,
when
> reading 325044, there is a /userva in the doc. But I read 316739 which
> explains how to use the /userva and I'm a little confused as to why
you
> would use that switch.
>
>
>
> Could some clarify for me as to why the /userva would benefit or would
not?
>
>
>
> TIA
>
>
>
> Thomas Gonzalez
>
> Technology Manager
>
> Girl Scouts of Southwest Texas
>
> 210.349.2404 phone
> 210.403.1586 DID
>
> 210.349.2666 fax
>
> www.girlscouts-swtx.org
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely
for
> the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you
should not
> read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions
expressed
> in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of
the Girl
> Scouts of Southwest Texas. Warning: Although precautions have been
taken to
> make sure no viruses are present in this email, Girl Scouts of
Southwest
> Texas cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise
from
> the use of this email or attachments.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely
for
> the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you
should not
> read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions
expressed
> in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of
the Girl
> Scouts of Southwest Texas. Warning: Although precautions have been
taken to
> make sure no viruses are present in this email, Girl Scouts of
Southwest
> Texas cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise
from
> the use of this email or attachments.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This email and any attached files are confidential and intended solely
for
> the intended recipient(s). If you are not the named recipient you
should not
> read, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions
expressed
> in this email are those of the author and do not represent those of
the Girl
> Scouts of Southwest Texas. Warning: Although precautions have been
taken to
> make sure no viruses are present in this email, Girl Scouts of
Southwest
> Texas cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage that arise
from
> the use of this email or attachments.
>
>

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~             http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja                ~

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~             http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja                ~

Reply via email to