Got it - it's not IP based but single message based - if that makes
sense.

 

thanks

 

________________________________

From: Carl Houseman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 1:16 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Tar Pitting

 

What is there to remember?

 

Tarpitting is simply this:

 

If you (the sending smtp server) tell me an invalid recipient, I am
going to wait for the tarpit delay time before I reject it and allow you
to continue the smtp conversation with me.

 

 

From: Don Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 4:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Tar Pitting

 

So, the tar pitting component does not remember from one message to the
next - even in the same connection?

 

________________________________

From: Carl Houseman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 1:05 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Tar Pitting

 

The only way I can fathom that legitimate mail could be affected would
be when a message contains both valid and invalid recipients.  This
particular message would be delayed for the valid recipients by (number
of invalid recipients) * (tarpit delay time).   Unless there are dozens
of invalid recipients included in this message, the delay would not be
significant. 

Carl

 

From: Bill Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 1:57 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Tar Pitting

 

Thanks, Carl.  I had thought that it wouldn't affect performance but
there was a statement in a MS article that said tar pitting may delay
the delivery of legitimate mail.

 

I appreciate the reply!

 

Bill Lambert

Concuity

847-941-9206

 

From: Carl Houseman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 11:39 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Tar Pitting

 

Tarpitting only changes behavior for mail that can't be delivered.
There's no effect on normal mail flow.   If you "filter recipients who
are not in the directory" and receive mail directly with no intervening
relay host, you should definitely enable it.

 

Carl

 

From: Bill Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 12:20 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Tar Pitting

 

I'm curious if any of you with Exchange 2003 that use recipient
filtering also use the SMTP tar pit feature.  If so, can you give
comments on its effect on mail flow/performance if any?

 

Thanks in advance for any advice/comments.

 

 

Bill Lambert

Windows System Administrator

Concuity

A healthcare division of Trintech, Inc.  

Phone  847-941-9206

Fax  847-465-9147

 

NASDAQ: TTPA

The information contained in this e-mail message, including any attached
files, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the
recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive information for the recipient) you are hereby
notified that you have received this communication in error and that any
review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this
message.  Thank you.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~             http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja                ~

<<image001.gif>>

Reply via email to