Cool. I could convert it, but I think I'd like to keep my security groups separate from my DLs - there may be no technical reason to do so, but it makes more sense to me.
Seem reasonable? On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 12:00 PM, James Winzenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Concur – whether global or universal, in order to use the group to assign > permissions, it must be a security group. Interesting that it doesn't even > give you the option to choose the group – we have had cases before where > public folder permissions have been applied using DL's, and it automatically > switches the scope of the group from distribution to security. Does not > affect the ability of the group to still receive email. > > > > James Winzenz > > Infrastructure Systems Engineer II - Security > > Pulte Homes Information Services > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Steve Ens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 11:56 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: Re: DL management by group... > > > > > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged > material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, > distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you have > received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately > by email and delete the message and any file attachments from your > computer. Thank you. > > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~
