No need, I just found it quite amusing...it reminded me of a project manager I once worked with, but I am sure he made up his own TLAs - he certainly invented his own cost centers, and I was the fool trying to book time against them.
2008/12/11 Ellis, John P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > With you..... > I can re-write it without TLAs. > John > ------------------------------ > *From:* Campbell, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Sent:* 11 December 2008 15:42 > *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues > *Subject:* RE: ISA 2004/OWA/RSA Timeouts > > Three Letter Acronym > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* Ellis, John P. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Sent:* Thursday, December 11, 2008 9:39 AM > *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues > *Subject:* RE: ISA 2004/OWA/RSA Timeouts > > > > TLA'ing? > > > > > > John > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* James Rankin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Sent:* 11 December 2008 15:22 > *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: ISA 2004/OWA/RSA Timeouts > > Wow. That is some TLA'ing you've got going there. > > Sorry I don't have an answer for you rather than just a smart-ass > observation :-) > > 2008/12/11 Ellis, John P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Hi all. We publish OWA via ISA which is NLB'd and use RSA SecurID for > authentication as well as AD authentication On the listener for OWA > under RSA tab its set to 15 mins timeout for the cookie. But if i leave > the OWA session doing nothing for around 5mins i get prompted to login > back into RSA. > Ive seen this article http://support.microsoft.com/kb/941162/en-us but > that applies to ISA 2006. > Does ISA 2004 have the same feature? > Is this an RSA feature ? or ISA Feature or something else? > Thanks > John > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > ********************************************************************** > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they > are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify > the system manager. > > This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by > MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. > > www.clearswift.com > ********************************************************************** > > > > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ > ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ > > > > > > > > > > ************************************************************************************************** > Note: > The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential > and > protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended > recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to > the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you > have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by > replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. > ************************************************************************************************** > > > > > > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~
