With a snapshot, not very long at all... ;o)
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Joe Heaton <jhea...@etp.ca.gov> wrote: > I guess I'm fortunate to have a manager that agrees with me then… > What's the recovery time on a 500GB store? > > > > Joe Heaton > > Employment Training Panel > > > > *From:* Don Ely [mailto:don....@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Monday, February 02, 2009 9:12 AM > *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: mail store size question > > > > Why would I have 500GB mail stores as well? I can only make > recommendations as to why its a bad thing... If in the end, they don't care > and give me more money for more disk space, so be it... > > On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 9:04 AM, Joe Heaton <jhea...@etp.ca.gov> wrote: > > Why would you have mailboxes larger than 6GB? I think the philosophy of > using e-mail as a file transfer/storage is flawed. There are too many > other, better, more secure methods of transferring and storing files. We > give a warning at 150 MB, and shut them down at 200MB. > > > > Joe Heaton > > Employment Training Panel > > > > *From:* Don Ely [mailto:don....@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Monday, February 02, 2009 8:36 AM > > > *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: mail store size question > > > > I have mailboxes bigger than that... :P > > On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 6:16 AM, David.Ricci <david.ri...@hwinstitute.com> > wrote: > > Is a 6 gig mail store large for 2003 sp2 exchange? > > > > > > David > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~