With a snapshot, not very long at all...  ;o)


On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Joe Heaton <jhea...@etp.ca.gov> wrote:

>  I guess I'm fortunate to have a manager that agrees with me then…
> What's the recovery time on a 500GB store?
>
>
>
> Joe Heaton
>
> Employment Training Panel
>
>
>
> *From:* Don Ely [mailto:don....@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, February 02, 2009 9:12 AM
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: mail store size question
>
>
>
> Why would I have 500GB mail stores as well?  I can only make
> recommendations as to why its a bad thing...  If in the end, they don't care
> and give me more money for more disk space, so be it...
>
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 9:04 AM, Joe Heaton <jhea...@etp.ca.gov> wrote:
>
> Why would you have mailboxes larger than 6GB?  I think the philosophy of
> using e-mail as a file transfer/storage is flawed.  There are too many
> other, better, more secure methods of transferring and storing files.  We
> give a warning at 150 MB, and shut them down at 200MB.
>
>
>
> Joe Heaton
>
> Employment Training Panel
>
>
>
> *From:* Don Ely [mailto:don....@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, February 02, 2009 8:36 AM
>
>
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: mail store size question
>
>
>
> I have mailboxes bigger than that...  :P
>
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 6:16 AM, David.Ricci <david.ri...@hwinstitute.com>
> wrote:
>
> Is a 6 gig mail store large for 2003 sp2 exchange?
>
>
>
>
>
> David
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~             http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja                ~

Reply via email to