Ah, but you're not the average user/manager.
Sarcasm? - me?? ________________________________ From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov] Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 9:38 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: mail store size question No Don, I'd change the tool in my hand and use a screwdriver. Did I miss the point of your sarcasm? Joe Heaton Employment Training Panel From: Don Andrews [mailto:don.andr...@safeway.com] Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 9:08 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: mail store size question Gee, you probably also disagree with the "I have a hammer in my hand and am using it to drive these screws - it isn't working well so fix the screws" philosophy. ________________________________ From: Joe Heaton [mailto:jhea...@etp.ca.gov] Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 9:04 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: mail store size question Why would you have mailboxes larger than 6GB? I think the philosophy of using e-mail as a file transfer/storage is flawed. There are too many other, better, more secure methods of transferring and storing files. We give a warning at 150 MB, and shut them down at 200MB. Joe Heaton Employment Training Panel From: Don Ely [mailto:don....@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 8:36 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: mail store size question I have mailboxes bigger than that... :P On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 6:16 AM, David.Ricci <david.ri...@hwinstitute.com> wrote: Is a 6 gig mail store large for 2003 sp2 exchange? David ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~
