I haven't had to do any tuning whatsoever on the appliance.  A major
criteria for detection is based on the reputation of the sender (via
Secure Computing's "Trusted Source"), and it is very good at singling
out bad guys.  That isn't to say that it doesn't do any other
evaluations (it actually does something like 20 IIRC), but reputation is
a major factor.  Clients are able to make their own whitelists for false
positives, and there have been few instances where I had to whitelist
something at the organizational level (generally needed if the return
address is dynamic).
 
Installation service is part of the deal (non-optional as I recall).  It
did not take him long to get it up and running, but there are a lot of
options in there and I don't know that I would have felt comfortable
trying to set it up without him there.
 
Bill

________________________________

From: Brian Dugas [mailto:br...@summit-technical.com] 
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 4:24 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Anti-SPAM Appliances


We use GFI for SPAM control - work decent, but requires alot of tuning.
 
Does Ironport require much in the way of tuning rules for SPAM?
 
Do you really need an installer?  From what I have read its almost
plug-n-play.
 

Thanks,

Brian

_______________________________

Brian Dugas
MIS Director
Summit Technical Services, Inc.
bdu...@summit-technical.com
401-736-8323 Ext.1011
www.summit-technical.com 

 

________________________________

From: Theochares, George [mailto:gtheocha...@campbell-trial-lawyers.com]

Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 4:15 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Anti-SPAM Appliances


Yes, we started using Ironport this January after years of using Trend.
No problems at all. Support is great and the users are very happy. The
encrpytion feature has become very useful in the legal business.

________________________________

From: Mayo, Bill [mailto:bem...@pittcountync.gov] 
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 4:11 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Anti-SPAM Appliances


We have an IronMail that we purchased a little over a year ago.  We had
major problems with spam at that time (our software solution wasn't
cutting it), and the IronMail eliminated them.  Having spam sneak
through is relatively (legit to spam ratio) rare these days.  The
installer was a real pro, and little administration is required.  We
haven't had many issues, but when they arise, their support has been
very responsive.
 
Bill

________________________________

From: Brian Dugas [mailto:br...@summit-technical.com] 
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 3:10 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Anti-SPAM Appliances


Hello Everyone - 
 
Does anyone out there use the Ironport appliance?  If so, what are your
thoughts.
 

Thanks,

Brian


 


 


 


 


~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~             http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja                ~

Reply via email to