TS would be the way to go. PST files are not supported on a network drive so you are just asking for problems there. Can they use IMAP instead of POP if TS is not an option.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Martin Blackstone <mblackst...@gmail.com>wrote: > Terminal Server? > That way no matter where they are, they have their own desktop. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dennis Rogov [mailto:dennis_rogov2...@yahoo.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 6:12 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: Suggestions if Roaming Profiles is the Answer > > Hi Everyone: > > i currently have 10 employees that are using outlook in 3 multiple > locations. We currently don't have roaming profiles implemented which is why > when the sign in another location they dont see their updated emails and use > a local pst that is on that machine. I need to come up with a strategy where > all these 10 employee can log into any windows XP machines across all 3 > sites and alot of times they don't have a dedicated machine at either sites > . Now here is the dilemma we don't have an exchange server we use outlook > with POP connectivity to network solution mail server. We also use mix of > LDAP and personal address books. We do have two DC's out of the 3 sites. One > of the Dc's is 2000 and the other 2003.. The connection between site A and > Site B is T1 1MB and the connection between site B and site C is 10 MB. > Traffic that needs to get from C to A is routed through B first. With all > of the above information what would be the most effecient plan? > > > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ > ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ > > > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ > ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ > > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~
