Hey Martin, I do understand that it is more of an Outlook thing but can you 
elaborate on "Control the items in their folders"?

Thanks
Shay

From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 8:55 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Large Mailboxes Performance

I don't think large mailboxes from an Exchange perspective are a performance 
issue.
The issue mainly lies in Outlook performance and if your users can somehow 
learn to control the items in their folders, the performance will be fine.

From: Mayo, Shay [mailto:shay.m...@absg.com]
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 6:38 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Large Mailboxes Performance

Hey,

Just curious what type of performance people have had with large mailboxes on 
Exchange 2007. Our company has a strict email retention policy that purges 
email after 30 days, but we have about 200 people though that have special 
circumstances where they need to store email long term. We implemented an 
archiving product from C2C about 1 and ½ years ago which turned out to be a far 
less than desirable solution for our users.

We have fully migrated to Exchange 2007 and are kicking around the idea of not 
having a 3rd party archiving system and just allowing larger mailboxes (3-10 
GB) for these special users. So my question is, what kind of performance have 
you guys seen with mailboxes this large? Do they benefit from Office 2k7 or 
have they actually ran fine with Office2k3? Lastly, a lot of these users travel 
and will be using cached Exchange mode. So I am mainly worried about 
performance from large OSTs....

Thanks

Shay Mayo // Systems Administrator
AmerisourceBergen Specialty Group
Ph. 469-365-7160 // s...@absg.com<mailto:s...@absg.com>




CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE.  This electronic mail transmission may contain 
privileged and/or confidential

information and is intended only for the review of the party to whom it is 
addressed.   If you have

received this transmission in error, please immediately return it to the 
sender, delete it  and destroy

it without reading it.  Unintended transmission shall not constitute the waiver 
of the attorney-client

or any other privilege.







CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE.  This electronic mail transmission may contain 
privileged and/or confidential
information and is intended only for the review of the party to whom it is 
addressed.   If you have 
received this transmission in error, please immediately return it to the 
sender, delete it  and destroy 
it without reading it.  Unintended transmission shall not constitute the waiver 
of the attorney-client 
or any other privilege.

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~             http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja                ~

Reply via email to