Cough.. I think that they might have done that... you are so smart and stuff..
I will go check the Health check stuff. ~Kevinm WLKMMAS- This message is Certified Swine Flu Free My life http://www.hedonists.ca<http://www.hedonists.ca/> From: Jeremy Phillips [mailto:jere...@cohesivelogic.com] Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 10:39 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Behind an F5 It would be more interesting if they did some kind of weird setup where it's the same F5. Thanks, Jeremy Phillips Managing Consultant | Cohesive Logic LLC | M: 540-322-7980 | BB PIN: 318A6889 From: Alex Fontana [mailto:afontana...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 10:19 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Behind an F5 The F5 *can* be setup for health checks, and if properly deployed *does* have health checks in place so when the services go down the F5 will yank it from the pool for x seconds before re-checking. We use F5's and don't do squat with them when we patch. Interesting that they use F5's between ISA and CAS as opposed to using ISA's load-balancing... -alex On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 7:27 AM, KevinM <kev...@wlkmmas.org<mailto:kev...@wlkmmas.org>> wrote: Some Network I just took over goes a little something like this. Interwebs === F5 === ISA pool === F5 === CAS + Hub pool Patching time is this weekend. Should I do anything in the F5 to disable the nodes as I patch the servers, or just patch things. -Discuss ~Kevinm WLKMMAS- This message is Certified Swine Flu Free My life http://www.hedonists.ca<http://www.hedonists.ca/> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~
