That will probably prove useful. I'll make note of that during the
conversations we have.

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 13:29, Sobey, Richard A <r.so...@imperial.ac.uk> wrote:
> PF replication will always take a lesser precedent to normal mail traffic, 
> and you can configure it to happen out of hours, if any such things exists in 
> your company.
>
> You might also have the luxury - depending on costs and how much time you 
> have - of setting up an Exchange PF store on a new server locally, 
> replicating your PFs to it, then shipping it off somewhere.
>
> Cheers :)
>
> ________________________________________
> From: bounce-8549838-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com 
> [bounce-8549838-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf Of Kurt Buff 
> [kurt.b...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 28 May 2009 19:48
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: PF replication, latency and archiving
>
> All,
>
> We're implementing SEA here, and have three offices - one here in the
> US, one in the UK and one in AU. The latency between offices for data
> transfer is pretty huge, as you might expect, with the further
> handicap that the UK office has a consumer grade DSL connection of
> 768/128.
>
> To illustrate the problem, a robocopy of about 35gb from the US office
> to the AU office took nearly two weeks - and they have a 2mb SDSL
> connection.
>
> The AU office has about 30gb in mailboxes and 3gb in PFs, the UK
> office has about 42gb in mailboxes and 21gb in PFs.
>
> Only some of the PFs are replicated to the US office - I don't know
> how exactly many at the moment, but it's probably fewer than half.
>
> Questions:
> 1) Do any of you have a similar situation with latency? If so, how
> does SEA perform for you?
>
> 2) I think it makes sense to replicate all foreign office PFs to the
> US office, on the theory that SEA will pull replicas locally, and that
> native Exchange replication will be gentler on bandwidth consumption
> than SEA. Can anyone confirm or disconfirm this theory?
>
>
> Any thoughts on this welcome...
>
> Kurt
>
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~             http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja                ~
> ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
> ~             http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja                ~
>
>

~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~
~             http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja                ~

Reply via email to