No, it's completely unreasonable. That's especially true if the money isn't there to support the infrastructure.
But, it's not merely the disk storage for Exchange. It's also bandwidth for the rest of the users, both in the office, and also the poor ba***rds on the road with RPC/HTTPS synching their laptops with that pig of an email in the skinny python of his hotspot connection. SMTP != FTP, pure and simple. On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:14, Matt Moore<mattmoore...@hotmail.com> wrote: > The voice of reason! =) > > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:mblackst...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 10:11 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: what is your maximum message size in exchange 2007 > > I think I set it at 75 MB. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dennis Melahn [mailto:den...@advancedav.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 9:24 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: what is your maximum message size in exchange 2007 > > Was just curious if I was being unreasonable to my Sales department with my > firm stand on 10 meg. > > Thanks, > Dennis > > > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ > ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ > > > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ > ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.50/2150 - Release Date: 06/11/09 > 05:53:00 > > > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ > ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~
