5 Cylinder Direct Injection Turbo Diesel with Intercooler ECU Controlled 122 bhp (120 PS, 90 kW) at 4200 rpm 300 Nm (221 lb.ft) of torque at 1950 rpm 2200kg (ish in weight)
-----Original Message----- From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: 29 June 2009 16:52 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT: American automotive (was: Is Exchange Doomed?) What's the specs on a TD5 power plant? -sc > -----Original Message----- > From: Ellis, John P. [mailto:johnel...@wirral.gov.uk] > Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 5:02 AM > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: OT: American automotive (was: Is Exchange Doomed?) > > Can I chip in with a non American vehicle? > Land Rover 110 Td5 full time 4x4 139k miles and 28mpg around town and > 32/33mpg on a run. 2500cc 5 Cylinder. Manual. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sobey, Richard A [mailto:r.so...@imperial.ac.uk] > Sent: 29 June 2009 09:41 > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: RE: OT: American automotive (was: Is Exchange Doomed?) > > Makes me so proud of my ~60MPG @ 70MPH in my new Mini Cooper Diesel > (and ~40MPG @ 105MPH, but I never did that, honestly). > > /loves fuel bill. > > -----Original Message----- > From: bounce-8579465-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com > [mailto:bounce- 8579465-8066...@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] On Behalf > Of Ben Scott > Sent: 26 June 2009 16:47 > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > Subject: Re: OT: American automotive (was: Is Exchange Doomed?) > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Ben Scott<mailvor...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Amazingly enough, doing 80 MPH in 5th gear yields lower MPG than > >> doing 65 MPH in 5th gear. :-) > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Micheal Espinola > Jr<michealespin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I believe it. I've def. had cars that had lower MPG at 75+. I've > > never seen savings at 55. > > Gah, I'm an idiot. I reversed the intended sense in my statement. > I was trying to be sarcastic with the "Amazingly", and so reinforced > the confusion. > > MPG is better at 65 MPH than 80 MPH. How much, I'm not sure, but I > know I can use less gas if I drive less aggressively. > > I do tend to drive aggressively. I also haven't had the plugs > changed in too long. And I'm an AC junky. So I typically get between > 21 and 25 MPG in my 9-year-old Forrester. On all-highway trips when > it was new, 28 to 30 MPG, easily. > > 80 MPH is pushing the engine a bit, I think. Not "oh my God it's > going to explode", but it's starting to whine a little. I got it up > to just over 90 MPH once, then concern for both road safety and the > engine won over and I backed off. The speedometer goes up to 120 MPH > but I think that's being optimistic. 90 was already getting close to > redline, and the engine sounded like a blender on puree. This is on > the 4-cylinder base engine. They have an H6 on some models that's > considerably beefier, or so I've read. > > It's interesting to hear that some cars get lower MPG at higher > speeds. I wouldn't have expected that. > > -- Ben > > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ > ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ > > > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ > ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ > > > ********************************************************************** > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they > are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify > the system manager. > > This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by > MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. > > www.clearswift.com > ********************************************************************** > > > > ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ > ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~ ~ Ninja Email Security with Cloudmark Spam Engine Gets Image Spam ~ ~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Ninja ~
