That is actually a fine idea 2009/7/13 Kurt Buff <kurt.b...@gmail.com>
> This is an easy fix. > > Find (or compose) a silly email on someone else's non-attended, > non-screensavered machine, and send it to the all users list. > > One of my favorites is to announce candy or cookies at the victim's desk. > > Be sure to wipe up for fingerprints afterward, if you happen to do it > to an executive, though. > > Heh. > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 08:43, Kennedy, Jim<kennedy...@elyriaschools.org> > wrote: > > +1 > > > > > > > > You have given them the recommendation and they have decided. Let it go, > > move on and ignore the emails in the future. You may be sick of them but > > management is not. Yet. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Matt Moore [mailto:mattmoore...@hotmail.com] > > Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 11:22 AM > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > Subject: RE: Distribution lists > > > > > > > > In that case my advice is to turn a blind eye and let those execs worry > > about it. If it’s un-monitored, it’s just that. No worries. > > > > M > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] > > Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 7:20 AM > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > Subject: Re: Distribution lists > > > > > > > > I would if I could, but I can't. Not until some idiot sends something > that > > gets on one of the exec team's nerves. Just wondering if there was any > other > > way I could spare myself some pain. > > > > I know the old adage about technological solutions to behavioural > problems, > > though, it has never rung truer > > > > 2009/7/13 Matt Moore <mattmoore...@hotmail.com> > > > > Limit access to a chosen few and all the spam goes away. > > > > M > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > From: James Rankin [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] > > Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 7:07 AM > > > > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues > > Subject: Distribution lists > > > > > > > > Afternoon Exchange gurus > > > > Is it possible to have the "All Staff" distribution list (or any other, > > really) set up so that when an email is sent to it, it goes to an > > administrator for approval first? I am sick of getting emails that say > > "there is a salesman selling cards in reception" and when someone spammed > > the DL with a hoax that was well-documented on snopes.com, I ended up > > getting a reprimand from my boss about being harsh to users. I only > > threatened to remove her ability to send to the DL. Sheesh. I know that > we > > shouldn't give all users the ability to send to it, but I doubt I am > going > > to shift my boss's boss's stance on this one. > > > > Any other pointers would be also gratefully received, I am not much of an > > Exchange bod. > > > > TIA, > > > > > > JRR > > > > -- > > "On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into > > the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not > able > > rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke > such > > a question." > > > > http://raythestray.blogspot.com > > > > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > > Version: 8.5.387 / Virus Database: 270.13.7/2222 - Release Date: 07/12/09 > > 17:56:00 > > > > > > -- > > "On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into > > the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not > able > > rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke > such > > a question." > > > > http://raythestray.blogspot.com > > > > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > > Version: 8.5.387 / Virus Database: 270.13.7/2222 - Release Date: 07/12/09 > > 17:56:00 > > > -- "On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." http://raythestray.blogspot.com
