The argument is that when you add more complexity to an application you're going to have more complexity in the configuration. Honestly, they could of kept majority of that functionality in the GUI. I think it was a vast attempt to appease the CL weenies of the world. And it back fired IMO. I like E2K7, but I think they alienated majority of the population that buys their product. The GUI configuratbility from an Admin/Engineer standpoint is one of the big reason's Exchange stood out from the pack from the rest of the messaging platforms.
John Bowles ________________________________ From: John Hornbuckle [john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us] Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 10:22 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 RTM? I have no clue what MS was thinking when they made that choice. Adding functionality to the CLI is great. But who, exactly, thought it would be a good idea to REMOVE functionality from the GUI? John Hornbuckle MIS Department Taylor County School District 318 North Clark Street Perry, FL 32347 www.taylor.k12.fl.us<https://outlook.com/owa/UrlBlockedError.aspx> From: John Bowles [mailto:john.bow...@wlkmmas.org] Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 10:13 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 RTM? +1 John Bowles ________________________________ From: McCready, Rob [rob.mccrea...@dplinc.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 8:34 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 RTM? Has anybody played with Exchange 2010 yet? I’m curious to know if they incorporated any more functions into the GUI. This PowerShell stuff of typing in 240 characters for one simple requests is for the birds. Holy step backwards. From: Andrew Levicki [mailto:and...@levicki.me.uk] Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 4:10 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: Re: Exchange 2010 RTM? Hi Troy, It was in the news. http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2009/11/09/453096.aspx And it comes shortly after they announced it was Code complete: http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/2009/10/08/452775.aspx Enjoy! Andrew 2009/11/9 Ben Scott <mailvor...@gmail.com<mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:58 PM, <tbarnh...@rcrh.org<mailto:tbarnh...@rcrh.org>> wrote: > I thought we were still months out on these. Is this correct that this is > the RTM? http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=exchange+2010+rtm -- Ben NOTICE: Florida has a broad public records law. Most written communications to or from this entity are public records that will be disclosed to the public and the media upon request. E-mail communications may be subject to public disclosure.
