I'm not using any of those - I'm using the *when a message header contains
specific words* condition, with the SMTP address of the DL as the data. The
way I read it, *when any of the recipients in the To field is a member of
distribution list* condition would flag every mail sent, as every user is a
member of the All Staff DL. Or do I have the wrong understanding - do they
have to be a direct member, rather than a nested member?

On 8 February 2010 14:02, Michael B. Smith <[email protected]> wrote:

> Well, there are three relevant options for DL's, "when any of the
> recipients in the To field is a member of distribution list", "when any of
> the recipients in the Cc field is a member of distribution list", "when any
> of the recipients in the To or Cc fields is a member of distribution list".
>
> Which do you have picked?
>
> Regards,
>
> Michael B. Smith
> Consultant and Exchange MVP
> http://TheEssentialExchange.com
>
> From: James Rankin [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 6:08 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: Transport rule query
>
> I have a transport rule to redirect messages sent to my All Staff DL to
> certain recipients for moderation. I do this using the "when a message
> header contains specific words" condition and entering the SMTP address of
> the DL. This works very well. However, it seems to be avoided when anyone
> cc's the All Staff DL. Is there any way I can modify this rule so I can also
> snag the messages cc'ed to the DL? This is on Exchange 2007.
>
> TIA,
>
>
>
> JRR
>
> --
> "On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into
> the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able
> rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such
> a question."
>
>
>


-- 
"On two occasions...I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr Babbage, if you put into
the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able
rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such
a question."

Reply via email to