Thanks Dan...the info you provided on what does/doesn't work is very
valuable to me. Sounds great that you only had 150 accounts to migrate
over a weekend. Unfortunately, we have about 1500 mailboxes so we
probably could not accomplish in a weekend. We are also looking at the
option that Joe pointed out, where a product similar to Messaging
Architects is used to help get the info migrated over.

>>> Dan Abernathy <[email protected]> 8/14/2010 7:37 PM >>>

Lori,
We just did this about a month ago, and decided to do a “hot” cutover
spanning a weekend. We were migrating from NetWare/eDirectory as well as
GroupWise, we used the Quest tools to do it, and for the most part it
worked great. We were able to bring over personal GroupWise archives
into Outlook .pst format – if you do that it’s good to run a standalone
GWCheck on the archive first before running it through the Quest
migrator. The biggest gotcha we had was the Frequent Contacts address
book in GroupWise. It self-populates, so your users are almost certainly
making use of it whether they’re aware of it or not, and it’ll be a mess
of old/bad contacts mixed in with good ones. Once migrated over, it did
–not- show up as a contacts folder in Outlook that people can select
from when composing mail. So we’ve had to tell people to click Contacts
in Outlook, and look through Frequent Contacts and Move good ones into
the “Contacts” folder. We also had issues with some personal
distribution lists not working correctly (“this address is invalid” for
several entries), which could usually be fixed by opening the group and
clicking Update Now.
We had no issues at all with peoples’ calendar items converting to
Outlook, though we did have to re-create a couple of shared calendars
that we had set up as “dummy” users, e.g. Sales Group Calendar that half
a dozen people had proxy access to so they could post itineraries on it.
We also recreated our resource/conference rooms.
You didn’t say what version of GroupWise or how large your installation
is; we’re small, about 150 email users spread over two GroupWise post
offices in two cities. We went from GroupWise 8 to Exchange 2010. We
brought the server hosting the smaller of the two GroupWise post offices
to the main office on Friday evening so we could avoid trying to migrate
their GW data over the WAN.
Dan
 

From:Lori Binner [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2010 1:46 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 - A Practical Approach

 

Hi Joe-

I'm hoping you'll post how your migration goes to the list so we can
see how things went. We're on GroupWise too (it's been our only email
for over 12 yrs now) but the rest of our network for everything else has
migrated from NetWare to MS for a few yrs now and we'll be going to
Exchange in the future, just not exactly sure when yet. I view this list
trying to gain any bit of knowledge I can about Exchange to try and
help.

 

We're having a difficult time deciding what's best to get our GroupWise
appts/scheduling and emails to Exchange due to the
calendaring/scheduling/busy searching being used VERY heavily here. We
had a test environment with the MS Connectors/API gateway (to see if
that could run for a few months while we slowly migrate users) and also
tested Quest for getting their data migrated, but determined that a slow
migration trying to rely on this old/unsupported technology was not the
best from a user stand-point as their are some drawbacks to using this
for appts. So looks like a very quick weekend or shortest migration
possible will work best. Although our users seem to do better with
slower phased approach, we may have to bite the bullet with as quick a
migration as possible due to the scheduling.

 

Thanks, Lori

>>> Joseph Heaton <[email protected]> 8/13/2010 1:31 PM >>>
I haven't gotten any books yet, but I just finished an Exchange 2010
class, in preparation for our migration from.... Groupwise.  Finally
getting off the Novell side of the house.

>>> Jason Gurtz <[email protected]> 8/10/2010 6:49 AM >>>
Yea, I think you may be right; it's pretty short too.  We're also going
to
be making the same migration.  Hopefully have most users on Office
2010
too.  Life is good.

~JasonG

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 09:37
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 - A Practical Approach
> 
> I thinking more like Chapter 10.  We're moving from 2003.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Gurtz [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 7:50 AM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Exchange 2010 - A Practical Approach
> 
> The 911 page book plopped on my desk yesterday.  I'm starting at
Chapter
> 14...  :)
> 
> ~JasonG
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:[email protected]] 
> > Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 14:32
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: OT: Exchange 2010 - A Practical Approach
> >
> > Just got in my Exchange 2010 books!  One of them is Exchange 2010 -
A
> > Practical Approach.  A short read at 182 pages, I'm hoping this
will
> get
> > me up to speed enough to get a server up and running to play on,
then
> on
> > to the 911 and 813 page books for the nitty-gritty.  A quick thumb
> > through looks good, and MBS is the Technical Reviewer.
> >
> > -Paul
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 








This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential, are
intended solely for the use of the addressee, and may be legally
privileged. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the
sender immediately; disclosing, copying, distributing, or taking any
action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly
prohibited. 

Reply via email to