Ask your companies lawyer. This is not something new. There are several companies who have to maintain voicemail / phone records for specific individuals.
If it exists, it can be discoverable. Make sure you have an appropriate records retention policy and follow it. If it says you keep something 7 days, then make sure it's gone on day 8. However the one simple answer is, if it's in your users mailbox, then it's most likely discoverable. On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 7:36 AM, Micheal Espinola Jr < michealespin...@gmail.com> wrote: > I dont like to cross-post, but this is something that should be of > interest to both lists: > > From what I am currently being advised about, unified messaging opens > a "hole" of sorts into a subpoena for email being synonymous with > voice mail when running a unified messaging platform. Make sense, but > is it really a risk? > > I would *think* that if you are under suspicion enough for a judge to > sign-off on a subpoena for email, that voice mail would be just as > easy to subpoena too - or something that is included (in terms of > electronically stored communications). > > But, I am being told by members of the local legal community that > voice mail is still something that "flies under the radar". Whatever > the hell that is supposed to mean. > > Of course, there are no specific offered with this "advise", other > than multiple lawyers are strongly advising against it. > > Anyone have any thoughts/comments/experience in this realm? > > -- > ME2 <http://www.santeriasys.net/> > > ~ CounterSpy Enterprise: Editor's Choice WindowsIT Pro Magazine! ~ > ~ <http://www.sunbelt-software.com/CounterSpyEnterprise.cfm> ~ > --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/ or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist
