Not knowing your configuration in detail leads to more questions than
answers.  But, a properly configured ESX/iSCSI setup will absolutely
scream.  I have yet to virtualize our Exchange environment but our SQL
server performance increased at least 50% on average when we went from
direct attached Ultra 320 SAS drives in a raid 10 config to our EQ SAN
with SATA's.  The physical box and ESX Host were identical servers.  And
that was mostly because of increased spindles and a whole lot more cache
on the controllers.  I know it's like comparing apples to oranges with
your environment but generally speaking there's best practices for ESX
and iSCSI no matter who your vendor is.  EQ has some excellent white
papers for properly configured VM Exchange servers using iSCSI with MPIO
inside the guest.  And the examples they test are running 5000 users per
guest with varying mail store sizes.  I'm sure IBM does to.  And
starting with ESX 4 you can do MPIO with your iSCSI storage at the Host
level which is suppose to increase performance also.  

________________________________

From: Phil Hershey [mailto:phers...@agia.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 12:13 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Support on VMware?



Thanks, Dave.  I expect a large part of the reason our performance is so
poor is that we haven't had the ability to dedicate spindle sets on our
NetApp to Exchange or the SQL servers either.  These each get a blade of
their own natively running the OS/app (not virtualized), but they're all
sharing just a couple of 'aggregates' between a number of machines that
are shared with 4 blades running ESX 3.0.2 and hosting a number of
'small' servers.  Of course the NetApp vender said this would be just
fine.  Horse-hockey. I'll definitely be running the TSA as soon as I can
schedule a weekend window with no backup running.

 

Thanks again.

 

Philip

 

 

From: Dave Wade [mailto:dave.w...@stockport.gov.uk] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 9:33 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: MS Support on VMware?

 

Possibly.... but I thought it a valid question and worth pondering
on....

 

I suspect that the existing performance sucks because iSCSI SAN can't
deliver the IOPS Exchange 2003 needs. Our main Exchange servers are
Exchange 2003 still on real boxes and performance is generally "Ok(ish)"
but we have dedicated raid arrays in a Fibre connected the SAN for both
the logs and databases. When the Raid Groups were shared with other high
performance servers we did get performance issues. I suspect if Phillip
downloads the Exchange Troubleshooting Assistant (TSA)

 

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?familyid=4bdc1d6b-de3
4-4f1c-aeba-fed1256caf9a&displaylang=en

 

and runs it it will help him understand why the existing server
performance sucks. Until he understand what's wrong with the existing
system he won't know if moving forward will cure it or kill it. So if
the TSA reports no issues on the Exchange boxes then it could be network
issues are causing the slow down.

 

We also run an Exchange 2007 system for our school staff in Virtual
(VmWare 4.0u1) but with an Hitachi Fibre SAN with dedicated Raid-10
drives for the mail box stores. In general performance is OK but it did
graunch a tad when we were migrating data. 

 

I am about to start migrating the 2003 boxes to 2010 and don't really
expect too many issues with performance, but I did stick an extra 16Gb
of RAm in the VMWare hosts I am going to use. 

 

One "problem" with Exchange 2007 and 2010 and VMware is that they
reduced the disk performance needs by using "large" amounts of RAM as
disk cache. So when you stick them in VMWare you need to make sure you
have enough free RAM for Exchange to use.... So I think some of my
managers are going to miffed when I say they can't get 10 x Exchange
Mailbox Servers with 7000 users on each in a the size of VMWare box they
are currently buying. (But I will now let them use most of the disk
space).....

 

Dave Wade

Business Services I.C.T.

0161 474 5456

 

         

________________________________

        From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] 
        Sent: 10 November 2010 17:06
        To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
        Subject: Re: MS Support on VMware?

        I don't disagree.

        However, I was providing a generic answer to a generic and
obviously completely unresearched question.  A bit of clicking through
the links would likely provide more complete information.  A google
search would probably be, good, too.  I spent more time on this answer
than I did on my answer to the OP.

        
         

        On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Dave Wade
<dave.w...@stockport.gov.uk> wrote:

        Not sure thats the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the
truth......

         

        There are some specific exceptions for Exchange in Virtual.

         

        1) Mixing Database Availability Groups and VMWare availability
tools (e.g. HA) is not supported. I guess the issue is that the database
may fail over while the machine is being migrated. See the blog some one
else has just posted. This makes designing a supported solution
"interesting" because it would be nice to have your "Live/production"
database server in a VMWare cluster for hardware resilience and have a
second standby server on another site for disaster recovery. This is
unsupported. 

         

        To be supported you must put TWO virtual servers in the local
VMWare farm and exclude them from HA and have a third at your disaster
recovery site.

         

        2) The Unified Messaging role is not supported in virtual.

         

        Dave Wade

        Business Services I.C.T.

        0161 474 5456

         

                 

________________________________

                From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] 
                Sent: 10 November 2010 16:45 

                
                To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

                Subject: Re: MS Support on VMware?

                http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=897615

                
                
                 

                On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Phil Hershey
<phers...@agia.com> wrote:

                        Under what conditions, if any, will MS support
Exchange 2010 on VMware vSphere?  Our current Exchange 2003 is running
on an IBM blade/NetApp iSCSI SAN on ESX 3.0.2, and performance sucks.
Unfortunately the 'let's virtualize it' flu is running rampant here,
although my vote is to take the Exchange system physical (~450 users and
500GB in EDB, STM, LOG files).

                         

                        Thanks.

                         

                        Philip

                         

                        ---
                        To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
                        or send an email to
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
                        with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

                 

                ---
                To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
                or send an email to
listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
                with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

        
        
        
        
**********************************************************************
        Cut Carbon, Save Money, Save the Environment.
        
        Take the climate challenge and reduce your carbon footprint at
www.stockport.gov.uk/carboff
        
        This email, and any files transmitted with it, is confidential
and
        intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom
they
        are addressed. As a public body, the Council may be required to
disclose this email, or any response to it, under the Freedom of
Information Act 2000, unless the information in it is covered by one of
the exemptions in the Act. 
        
        If you receive this email in error please notify Stockport ICT,
Business Services via email.qu...@stockport.gov.uk and then permanently
remove it from your system. 
        
        Thank you.
        
        http://www.stockport.gov.uk <http://www.stockport.gov.uk/> 
        
**********************************************************************

        ---
        To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
        or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
        with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

         

        ---
        To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
        or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
        with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

---
To manage subscriptions click here:
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist


---
To manage subscriptions click here: 
http://lyris.sunbelt-software.com/read/my_forums/
or send an email to listmana...@lyris.sunbeltsoftware.com
with the body: unsubscribe exchangelist

Reply via email to