On Mon, 17 Oct 2005, Daniel Tiefnig wrote: > It sure IS the same problem, it just outputs differently because I have > an exim user, and John doesn't. The problem now is a hardcoded > "From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" in mail/0072.CALLER. I tried to substitute by > CALLERtest.ex and similar, but that didn't work out. :o)
I think I have fixed this. This week's additions to the suite are now in ftp://ftp.csx.cam.ac.uk/pub/software/email/exim/Testing/exim-testsuite-0.00.tar.bz2 There won't be any more for a while, because I am going to be away next week. I have fixed some of your previously reported problems, but not those that are concerned with the wording of SSL library error messages. I'm not sure what to do about those. We may just have to document the fact that there can be mismatches of wording caused by different releases of OpenSSL and GnuTLS. I had to do a minor fix to Exim for some of these tests - I've made a snapshot, but it is fail safe in the sense that the relevant tests will be skipped if you just use 4.54. They are for the obscure features translate_ip_address and move_frozen_messages. I expect you to have trouble with these new tests. They are exercising new things. Philip -- Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714. -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
