On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Daniel Tiefnig wrote: > Sounds reasonable, as supporting empty gecos fields could be a lot of work.
Took about 15 minutes. :-) What I have done is to detect the specific case of an empty gecos field, and then edit the *saved* file, to remove instances of " CALLER_NAME" before doing the comparison. I think this will work - no doubt you will test it when I next update the tests. I'm going to add a whole pile more first. Philip -- Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714. -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
