On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Fred Viles wrote:

> But the case of forwarded accounts seems different to me.  Whatever 
> a site's spam filtering prowess, as a willing user of the system you 
> are responsible for what happens to whatever email gets accepted on 
> your behalf.

But the "you" in that sentence is not so much the mail admin, as the 
individual user, isn't it?  For some of these institutions, I 
personally fit both descriptions, since I'm not only involved in 
administering the mail server here, but I also need an account at the 
remote research institution (and I find it convenient to forward its 
email from there to here, as do a proportion of other users).  
Whereas for some other institutions, I personally have no account 
there, although some of our users do.

In the discussion here, I was speaking primarily as a mail admin, but 
you've now shifted somewhat, and seem to be talking about an 
individual user of a remote account of this kind.

> The fact that you (the user) are choosing to auto-forward to another 
> site doesn't change that.
> 
> Shades of grey...

Indeed.  And our users (including ones senior to me, whose directions 
I would do well to follow) are not slow to complain if forwarded spam 
gets through our defences here and reaches their inbox.  They expect 
the mail admins to sort this out for them - they don't expect to have 
to do their own individual anti-spam filtering on top of that.  For 
direct mail, this works pretty well, but, as this discussion has 
shown, for forwarded mail it's less satisfactory.  I don't have a good 
solution.

best regards

-- 
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users 
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/

Reply via email to