I do not thing thet whitelisting is good, there are a lot of viruses that come that way. blacklisting is more effective, and han no false positive. even spamassassin has a whitelisting capability, and i use here. however the filter must be used by every single user, since there are many occasions where a source is considered spam by all but a few users.
Il 1 Oct 2005 alle 11:10 Odhiambo G. Washington immise in rete > * On 30/09/05 19:21 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote: > > One of the things that is creating SA load is processing good email. > > I'm trying to figure out a way to bless stuff that I know is ham so > > I can bypass spam assassin. And it has to somehow just learn it > > automatically. > DSPAM has that idea already and does whitelist senders. Perhaps you > can consider running DSPAM and SpamAssassin together. However, the > only instances I have seen that done are where the admins use SA > results to train DSPAM. > I'd say this: DSPAM has no load at all, if load is your concern, so > think about embracing it. -- Leonardo Boselli Nucleo Informatico e Telematico del Dipartimento Ingegneria Civile Universita` di Firenze , V. S. Marta 3 - I-50139 Firenze tel +39 0554796431 cell +39 3488605348 fax +39 055495333 http://www.dicea.unifi.it/~leo -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
