Nigel Wade wrote: >>>I'm currently leaning towards the idea of a separate Exim process handle >>>mail submission, and for this to relay the mail to the main Exim process >> I don't see why you should do that. It complicates things unnecessarily. >> But that, again, depends on your requirements. > One thing which puzzles me is that everyone is of the opinion that a > single Exim, with everything rolled into one config. is simpler. I don't
As I said, it depends on your requirements (which you didn't specify). If you want to treat submissions that much different, you may be better off using a seperate instance. But I'd bet it doubles many parts of the MTA config. > If you rely on STARTTLS, is it possible to enforce STARTTLS *before* > authentication, so some user doesn't configure their MUA to send their Of course. Look at server_advertise_condition and the wiki examples. -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
