Giuliano Gavazzi wrote: *snip*
> well, I do not see why Spamcop is flaky by listing a broken auto- > responder. Haven't a clue if Spamcop do that 'direclty' (doubtful) or if they are just responding to complaints resulting from a table-tennis game over smtp. We just haven't found them particularly *consistent* compared to, for example 'spamhaus'. YMMV, Bill -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
