On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 11:17:22AM +0100, Ian Eiloart wrote: > > > --On 17 October 2006 18:10:26 +0100 David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 16:09 +0100, Ian Eiloart wrote: > >> 1. People who bounce viruses with warning messages (actually, that's > >> fine). > > > > It's not fine to _bounce_ them -- they should be rejected. Generating > > bounces in responses to viruses is bad. > > Sorry, I meant it's fine to blacklist people who bounce viruses, not that > it's fine to bounce them.
I note that (e.g.) clamav has started generating false positives now they they try to detect ``phishing'' mail. However, I imagine that policies like the above are probably immutable. -- `When elected, our MP will go to the Antarctic, stand in front of the icebergs and shout, ``Stop melting you big, white bastards''. It's more than Bush and Blair are doing.' (2005 manifesto of the Church of the Militant Elvis Party) -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
