Jason Keltz wrote: > The problem with this approach, I believe, is that the sender gets back > "texthere", and the delivery is deferred. I would prefer for the > message to be accepted by the system, but queued for delivery until the > name is removed from the "temporary stop delivery" file.
That's what it does. Except it will inform the sending party. I assume you want to avoid actual notification of the email being deferred? I don't know the specifics by heart, but I am sure the configuration entry dealing with deferring email can be changed to not notify the sender. But that I believe would break smtp standards, so you'd rather create a custom entry. Best regards, Jeroen -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
