[email protected] wrote: > It does seem like we are going to need to beef up the Exim hardware and > perhaps go to local RBL. > >
Not necesarily. See if you can do this first: - if you dare, grant the 'trusted' incoming exemptions and with an 'endpass' - Insure the 'cheap' tests with the highest success rate come first. Ex: - chronic-offender? place the IP/range in ipfw or pf Exim: - IP-based LWL - IP-based LBL - rDNS lookup - dynamic IP RBL etc... THEN: - configure SA (if used) to do NO Bayes, NO AWL, NO IP, DNS, DK/DKIM, SPF tests. Basically NO callouts *of any kind*, just header eval and body analysis. Exim has already done the other ones that matter. Bill > > [email protected] wrote: >>> From: schmero...@gmail >>> We are getting duplicate emails. It seems to be the same senders, >>> however not every one of their emails duplicate. 5% of mails from >>> Charter.net will duplicate, 10% of mails from Cox will duplicate, 100% >>> of mails from Interfax.net will duplicate. >>> spamd_address = 127.0.0.1 783 >> I guess that your spam-filter queries some RBL, and one or more of them >> timeout because dead or for paying customers only. >> Try switch spam-filtering via spamd off temporarily. >> If that doesn't help then try to switch virus-filtering off temporarily. >> > -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
