On 20/05/2009, Dave Lugo <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 20 May 2009, W B Hacker wrote: > > > > Unless 'partially obfuscated' changed more than I think it did, roughly > > one-second processing is within reach on that one, as it is a known spam > engine: > > > > That's an interesting comment, as I have several customers for > which I've had to whitelist constantcontact. > > Can we stick to just the technical issue the OP is having?
Indeed. Anyone wishing to engage in heated discussion of whether Constant Contact are spammers or not will feel right at home over on the spam-l list - which, in case anyone's interested, has recently moved - details at www.spam-l.com. All sides of this argument, and several you won't have thought of yet, are well represented there. Peter -- Peter Bowyer Email: [email protected] Follow me on Twitter: twitter.com/peeebeee -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
