> I am also volunteer, but I would suggest using a CMS. Not to start an off-topic debate (and this Plone CMS you linked does look quite nice), but if www.exim.org has mostly static content (as it does now except for the docs section) there wouldn't be much of a real "need" for a CMS.
Implementing a CMS or any other technology on the site brings extra requirements from the hosting (which may also increase costs) as well as also means added maintenance in terms of staying on top of security issues with whatever you're using. Staying with static HTML pages and maybe at worst using SHTML for some dynamic pages keeps server requirements very low and also reduces the chances of pages being hacked. So, unless there are big revamp plans for www.exim.org, I would actually suggest staying with as much static HTML as possible; we can make the site XHTML 1.1 compliant and use some fancy DHTML stuff if we want, though I don't think it would require any kind of CMS at this time (especially since Nigel has already got the experience in maintaining the site as is - editing a few HTML pages wouldn't be out of place for him). However, discussion for a later time once plans have been laid out for what to do with the site :) Eli. -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
