I'll take a look at this. Thanks for the link. > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Todd Lyons > Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 3:43 PM > To: Raymond Jette > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [exim] Issues with greylisting > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Raymond Jette > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Is there a better implementation of greylisting than exim-greylist? > > Which one is everyone else using? I noticed that > exim-greylist is no > > longer maintained. > > I use one that only greylists IP addresses that don't have a > reverse DNS entry. It's described at: > > http://wiki.exim.org/GreylistMemcachedPerl > > If you wanted it to greylist everything that is inbound, just > drop the two "!condition" tests in the defer block and it > should do what you want. Note however, that this uses perl > and memcached. Another poster here made a simpler config > with memcache by using native exim commands, and you can find > it at the end of this thread: > > http://lists.exim.org/lurker/message/20090828.040358.7dcd69f5.en.html > -- > Regards... Todd > Real Integrity is doing the right thing, knowing that no > body's going to know whether you did it or not. > > >
-- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
