Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]> wrote: [...] > The two cases that have been most interesting so far are:
> -- > From: f...@bar > To: b...@blivit > This is not a header field > Subject: ha ha I fooled you > Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:08:22 -0700 > This is where the body is > -- > ...and > -- > From: f...@bar > To: b...@blivit > MIME-Version : 1.0 > Subject: did you notice that extra space? > Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:08:22 -0700 > This is where the body is > -- > Obviously the issue has to do with how exim handles the two > malformations found on the third line of each; in the first case > it's not a valid header field line, and in the second case there's a > space before the colon following the header field name. [...] In both cases the broken header is interpreted as the first body line. (In case somebody is wondering: verify = header_syntax does not make a difference.) cu andreas -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
