On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 3:47 AM, Ian Eiloart <[email protected]> wrote: > > In the first case, the line "This is not a header field", and all > subsequent headers are actually forced into the message body by inserting > the additional headers, and an empty line, before that line. Also, some fix > ups may be required if late headers include Date: Message-Id:, etc. I get > this result: > > Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:34:16 +0100 > Message-Id: <[email protected]> > From: f...@bar > To: b...@blivit > X-Sussex: true > X-Sussex-transport: remote_lmtp > > This is not a header field > Subject: ha ha I fooled you > Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:08:22 -0700 > > This is where the body is
+1 > In the second case, that doesn't happen, I get this result: > > Message-Id: <[email protected]> > From: f...@bar > To: b...@blivit > MIME-Version : 1.0 > Subject: did you notice that extra space? > Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:08:22 -0700 > X-Sussex: true > X-Sussex-transport: remote_lmtp > > This is where the body is +1 > In both cases, I pasted the example text into the DATA phase of a telnet > session, with no additional headers. +1 Murray, my results were the same as Ian's. I think in the end, exim does handle the second case a bit differently than the others you have queried, in that exim doesn't fix it up (whereas those others remove the space). -- Regards... Todd I seek the truth...it is only persistence in self-delusion and ignorance that does harm. -- Marcus Aurealius -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
