On 2025/07/31 10:47 AM, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
On 2025/07/31 10:09 AM, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:
On 2025/07/29 7:38 AM, Evgeniy Berdnikov via Exim-users wrote:
  Other macro definitions are displayed as expected. Similar output is
  with other Exim versions. What's wrong?

Smells like a bug.  I'll take a look.

Right.  Parsing quirk introduced with the facility to define new macros
during a "-be" session. Having expanded the "_DKIM_SIGN_HEADERS" the
result, having a leading capital letter, looked like a definition of
a new macro - but, lacking an '=', was malformed.  Prefixing a space
means no initial capital letter, hence a workaround.

Fix in the works.

Addressed by d6b3ba95eee7.

I should point out that prior to the above-noted facility introduction,
"-be" did not expand macros at all.  The support for displaying macros
using "-bP macro <foo>" has been around since 2009, and still works.

--
Cheers,
  Jeremy

--
## subscription configuration (requires account):
##   https://lists.exim.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/exim-users.lists.exim.org/
## unsubscribe (doesn't require an account):
##   [email protected]
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

Reply via email to