Good point, Bill, it is a shame one must use good bandwidth to teach  common
etiquette (I would assume it is not so "common" any longer).
Craig


Bill Shirley wrote:

> Whatever. I don't see anyone telling the original poster: "I have a xxx kbs
> internet connection and download at xx KB per second from such.andso.com
> server, therefore you should expect the same from your ISP.  If not, then
> find another vendor!"
>
> And the major point for comments like:
> > What are you smoking?  few servers with dish out 15k a second?  Give me
> > a
> > break.
> is that the person posting it is RUDE.  You could say, "Oh, that's not been
> my experience. ...." and then go on to say something about your connection
> (aDSL, ISDN, 56k, etc.) or where you dl from.  Something with some real meat
> in it.
>
> My question is: "Is any of this bantering about download speeds helping the
> guy that posted?!?"
>
> Bill
>
> P.S. Brian, did you get the null smbpasswords working?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian T.
> Schellenberger
> Sent: Monday, May 01, 2000 9:28 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: connection speeds--was: Re: [expert] X or console wont
> start
>
> Bill Shirley wrote:
> >
> > Then maybe we don't use the same servers!!  Just try to dl from microsoft
> > mid-day.
> >
> > I have seen a few servers drive my line to the max (like sunsite.unc.edu
> at
> > night and netscape).  I haven't dl'ed from cdrom.com in a long time, but
> > they used to be slow.  I've been on the internet since 1996, so I am
> > speeking from a cumlative experience.
>
> Yes; in fact, Netscape was the one where I meased the actual 1.2G
> throughput, though I've seen plenty at over 15k.  And plenty of them
> *are* lots slower, but I wouldn't say that
> "few" can go over 15k.
> >
> > I think we both agree there are several factors that can limit the actual
> > transmittion speed.  Whatever, I am NOT smoking anything or trying to get
> > into a pissing contest.  I was just trying to help the guy that originally
> > posted.
> >
> > > What are you smoking?  few servers with dish out 15k a second?  Give me
> > > a
> > > break.
> >
> > How constructive is this guy's post??  Did it help the guy that started
> the
> > thread?
>
> Well, I agree that the tone of his post was less then agreeable and less
> constructive than it might have been, but it did, in fact, provide some
> information to the original poster; namely, that it *should* be possible
> for him to get greater througput than he's getting.
>
> I believe this to be accurate based on my experience.
>
> [And let's net get into cumulative internet experience.  I've been
> connected one way or another since 1982 when it was usenet + arpanet +
> bitnet with various visible gateways connecting them . . . my wife was
> astounded when we visited NY and I was terribly excited to see the famed
> "SUNYBING" in glorious physical reality.  Yeah, I know.  Nobody here
> knows what I'm talking about . . . the speed then was often measured in
> *days* for messages to go across the world.  Physical mail was sometimes
> faster than e-mail and usually faster than newsgroup messages.]
>
> --
> "Brian, the man from babble-on"              [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Brian T. Schellenberger                      http://www.babbleon.org
> Support http://www.eff.org.                  Support decss defendents.
> Support http://www.programming-freedom.org.  Boycott amazon.com.
begin:vcard 
n:Woods;Craig
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
org:Celtic Pride, Inc.;Client/Server Technologies
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:IT Consultant
x-mozilla-cpt:;0
fn:Craig Woods
end:vcard

Reply via email to