> Please don't confuse Mandrake with Macmillan. OTOH, all new releases have to be When it comes to distribution of Linux Mandrake they are one and the same. > considered experimental. Linux as well as *the other*. Usually they'll tell > you so if you ask. But Mandrake tries to get the known bugs out, anyway. This is the epitomy of being an apologist. They say "it's not good enough to release so we'll call it beta" and then wrap it in plastic and sell it. > (Actually, for all the criticism that it's been hit with lately, I don't think > that Red Hat has been doing a bad job either. They're just a bit adventurous. And a hearty hi-oh silver. So because Microsoft does things poorly it's ok for others to do it poorly too? Personally, I don't want "adventurous" when it comes to my operating system. Computers are not toys for most people who use them. Your mileage may vary but I doubt you'll get much support for this view in the corporate world. Cheers --- Larry
Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.
