Dallam Wych wrote on Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 04:57:55PM +0000 : > On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 11:34:31AM -0500, Sascha Noyes wrote: > > The only reason that he posted privately (by error) is that you have got a > > "reply to" set while discussing on a mailing list. > I don't think so, I think it is a kmail thing. It isn't my mutts > fault that someones mailer can't deferentiate between a list reply > and a personal reply. I gather then that in kmail you don't have an > "r" option for a reply as opposed to "L" for a list reply?
You are correct, that is not something that other mailers besides mutt have. However, you are exacerbating the problem by forcibly setting a reply-to in your emails. That's the equivalent of using a quote reply string of "begin %n quotation:". Though it's funny to watch others squirm, you have no basis to complain when they *HONOR* your settings. In your .muttrc, comment out the 'set reply_to' setting, such as this: #set reply_to = ask-yes Blue skies... Todd -- | MandrakeSoft USA | Security is like an onion. It's made | | http://www.mandrakesoft.com | made up of several layers and makes | | http://www.mandrakelinux.com | you cry. --Howard Chu | Mandrake Cooker Devel Version, Kernel 2.4.20-2mdk
msg65247/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
